Henrik Lykkegaard – skuespiller, boller-reklamer og Cirkusrevy
` – that’s good. But let me check if there’s leading whitespace… The raw starts with `\n
**GATE 8** – Checking for forbidden phrases:
– “it’s worth noting” appears: “Det er værd at bemærke” – need to rephrase
– “at its core” – not found
– Other forbidden phrases – let me scan… “navigating the complexities” – not found. OK.
**GATE 2** – Contract coverage – checking the must_cover_questions:
1. “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaard gift med?” – covered by H2
2. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” – covered by H2
3. “Hvilke film og TV-serier har Henrik Lykkegaard medvirket i?” – need to check… The article has “Hvilke film og TV-serier har Henrik Lykkegaard medvirket i?” as H2 ✓
4. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?” – need to check… The article has “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?” – close but not identical. The gate says “verbatim wording where question_source=paa” – let me check the contract… The must_cover_questions has “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?” – the article title is “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?” ✓
5. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards rolle i Cirkusrevyen?” – need to check… The article has “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards rolle i Cirkusrevyen?” ✓
Wait, looking at the contract more carefully:
json
“must_cover_questions”: [
{
“h2”: “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaard gift med?”,
…
},
{
“h2”: “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?”,
…
},
{
“h2”: “Hvilke film og TV-serier har Henrik Lykkegaard medvirket i?”,
…
},
{
“h2”: “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?”,
…
},
{
“h2”: “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards rolle i Cirkusrevyen?”,
…
}
]
The article has:
1. “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaard gift med?” ✓
2. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” ✓
3. “Hvilke film og TV-serier har Henrik Lykkegaard medvirket i?” ✓
4. “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards familie?” ✓
5. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards rolle i Cirkusrevyen?” ✓
All covered.
**GATE 3** – Claim-source pairing. Let me check the snapshot cards and other lists:
– The intro paragraph doesn’t need citations (it’s a lead)
– The snapshot cards have source links ✓
– The timeline has source links ✓
– The confirmed facts list has source links ✓
**GATE 5** – FAQ dedup. The article has a FAQ section (the `
– FAQ “Hvor gammel er Henrik Lykkegaard?” vs H2 sections – no overlap
– FAQ “Hvor er Henrik Lykkegaard født?” – no overlap
– FAQ “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards højde?” – no overlap
– FAQ “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards bror?” – no overlap
– FAQ “Har Henrik Lykkegaard børn?” – no overlap
– FAQ “Hvornår startede Henrik Lykkegaards karriere?” – no overlap
– FAQ “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” – overlaps with H2 “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” – but it’s a narrow question, not the same as the H2 section (the H2 covers more ground). Need to check if >85% lexical overlap… The FAQ is just the question, not the content. Since FAQ items are questions and H2s are also questions, if they’re identical then one should be removed. But “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” appears as both H2 and FAQ – that’s >85% overlap (100%). But wait – the gate says “Remove FAQ item ONLY if >85% lexical overlap with H2/H3 OR exact same question.” – so this FAQ item should be removed.
Wait, but the FAQ also has other questions. Let me count minimum FAQ items: “HARD MIN: 5 FAQ items.” If I remove one, I have 6 left. That’s fine.
Actually let me re-read: “Remove FAQ item ONLY if >85% lexical overlap with H2/H3 OR exact same question.” So “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” in the FAQ is exactly the same as the H2. Remove it.
Actually, I need to count the FAQ items. Let me list them:
1. “Hvor gammel er Henrik Lykkegaard?” – keep
2. “Hvor er Henrik Lykkegaard født?” – keep
3. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaards højde?” – keep
4. “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaards bror?” – keep
5. “Har Henrik Lykkegaard børn?” – keep
6. “Hvornår startede Henrik Lykkegaards karriere?” – keep
7. “Hvad er Henrik Lykkegaard kendt for?” – REMOVE (exact duplicate of H2)
That leaves 6 items. Min is 5, so that’s ok.
Wait, but I need to check if there are other FAQ items with >85% overlap with H3s. Let me check the H3s:
– “Minimalistiske boller-reklamer” – no FAQ overlap
– “Revyforfatter i Cirkusrevyen” – no FAQ overlap
– “Medvirken gennem årene” – no FAQ overlap
– “Forventninger til 2026” – no FAQ overlap
– “Film” – no FAQ overlap
– “TV-serier” – no FAQ overlap
– “Forældre” – no FAQ overlap
– “Børn og bror” – no FAQ overlap
OK, so only one FAQ item to remove.
**GATE 6** – Link hygiene. Let me check all links:
– Internal links: The internal link dataset provides two links with specific anchors. Let me check if they’re used… Looking at the article, I see “Relateret læsning” section with:
– “Morten Arnfred – Filminstruktøren bag Olsen-banden” → https://dagensportal.dk/teknologi/morten-arnfred-biografi-film/
– “Ole Lemmeke – Den danske skuespiller og instruktør” → https://dagensportal.dk/blog/ole-lemeke-skuespiller-instruktor/
These are internal links (same domain). For internal links, I need to strip `target` and `rel` attributes. But looking at the raw, they don’t have target/rel. Good.
External links: Need to check each:
– https://www.dfi.dk/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://altomfuresoe.dk/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://folketidende.dk/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://da.wikipedia.org/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://www.imdb.com/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://cirkusrevyen.dk/… – has target=”_blank” rel=”noopener nofollow” ✓
– https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0528065/ – appears multiple times? Let me count…
The rule: “Each external URL at most once. Max 3 per domain.”
Let me count domain usage:
– dfi.dk: appears twice (DFI link in intro and DFI link in timeline). That’s a problem – max 3 per domain, but I need to check if it’s the same URL. Let me check… DFI link appears in the confirmed facts and timeline. Both use https://www.dfi.dk/viden-om-film/filmdatabasen/person/henrik-lykkegaard – same URL. The rule says “Each external URL at most once.” – so I need to deduplicate. I can use different anchor text but same URL is the issue.
Wait, the rule says “Each external URL at most once.” So if the same URL appears twice, one needs to be removed or replaced.
Let me check… In the raw article:
1. `` as the very first character. The raw starts with `\n
**GATE 8** – Forbidden phrases in Danish:
– “Det er værd at bemærke” = “it’s worth noting” → remove/rephrase. In the text: “Det er værd at bemærke, at Lykkegaard generelt holder sit privatliv for sig selv.” → Reformat: “Lykkegaard holder generelt sit privatliv for sig selv.”
**GATE 14** – Editorial voice:
– Intro takes a stance – the current intro is “Henrik Lykkegaard er en dansk skuespiller og revyforfatter, født 14. februar 1965.” – that’s a declaration, not a stance. Need to rewrite to take a stance.
Let me check the intro:
“Henrik Lykkegaard er en dansk skuespiller og revyforfatter, født 14. februar 1965.”
This is “X is a…” which is a forbidden opener. Need to rewrite.
**GATE 14.3** – Section closers. Let me check each H2 section:
Section “Hvem er Henrik Lykkegaard gift med?” ends with:
Oplysningen om ægtefællens navn stammer udelukkende fra brugerredigeret indhold. Indtil en primærkilde eller en officiel biografi bekræfter navnet, bør det behandles med forbehold.
This is a callout, not a paragraph. The gate says “If the last element of an H2 section is a
| Kategori | Detaljer |
|---|---|
| Fulde navn | Henrik Lykkegaard |
| Kategori | Detaljer |
|---|---|
| Fulde navn | Henrik Lykkegaard |